We know she’s right – and Ben does come around eventually – and they end up as happy fellow travellers: Polly teasing the Doctor, the Doctor ragging Ben, all of them blithely adopting a hunky highlander for zero gravity larks on the Moon’s surface. But I find myself asking what it is Polly and Ben have accepted: the reincarnation of the Doctor’s questing spirit, his eccentricity, his revolutionary zeal, in a new body, but a new personality, a new mind. He’s missing a few memories at first, and talks about his prior incarnation in the third person (‘The Doctor was a great collector, wasn’t he? I don’t look like him...’) If it wasn’t for Ben and Polly, what ‘continuity’ would he feel obliged to maintain with his first persona? What do these terms mean? Who is the Doctor, if he is no one man?
In his first seven stories we see different possibilities: the stories vary in style and so does the Doctor. David Whitaker has the right idea – the incorrigible detective led by curiosity into others’ affairs, disarming authority with rampant eccentricity (and bewildering his friends in the process) is instantly recognisable as the post-1974 Doctor. He’s less dignified than Hartnell or Pertwee, and less careful writers (hello Gerry Davis and Geoffrey Orme) take him so far into clownishness it’s hard for him to return to gravitas at crucial moments. Troughton is very good at conveying the sense that the fun is suddenly over, and something dreadful’s about to burst through the wall (in fact, it’s already coiled around your left ankle).
I still love these earlier stories – The Underwater Menace especially, for being so funny – but I like it even more when the show settles down and plays to its strengths. Power of the Daleks is the first Doctor Who story where something is so frightening it can drive a man insane. We have a cute runaround in history, and then The Underwater Menace with its token monsters. The Fish People are more pitiable than petrifying but they suddenly feel part of the furniture, and there is the first threat that you can be made into one of them. It’s like a natural progression from the Doctor’s reincarnation – the body can be altered, personality can change; why shouldn’t the soul be in danger too? In each successive story of this season, good men are turned bad by the enemy. Even the Doctor, or so it appears!
The show is less adventurous than it ever was with Bill Hartnell, but it grows in confidence as it finds its natural metier (frightening the life out of eight year olds). The Evil of the Daleks is an elegant, nightmarish epic adventure about essentially human qualities. This is the story that replaces the human soul with psychology and political consciousness – hello, Rousseau vs. Locke! The healthy scare is part of that story, hence the rather childlike companions. It’s a smart move with Jamie, undercutting a lot of machismo that could become tedious with a man of the modern age. Simpering Victoria, though, places the Doctor and Jamie in conventional male roles. We need a space age teen like Season 2’s Vicki, to keep them where they need to be: two big teddy bears, voyaging through the cosmos!
Don’t forget, me and my friend Sarah Hadley are both still blogging away about these stories here: http://campbellsrecorder.blogspot.co.uk/ Hopefully next week we will be voyaging to the lost city of the Cybermen, beneath the silver sands of the planet Telos...
As it’s the fiftieth anniversary year, I have been tempted into another marathon of a kind. Reading agendas are easier to come up with during the office drudge than to put into practice, but this is eleven books across the year – surely achievable...? We’ll see! I’ve looked at the unread novels I own, and the things that are out there and tempting me. I’ve also tried to pick from a selection of eras in Doctor Who fiction – and here’s my current plan:
Doctor Who and the Crusaders...
Foreign Devils...
The Harvest of Time...
Festival of Death...
The Crystal Bucephalus...
Killing Ground...
White Darkness...
The Banquo Legacy...
What do you think?





...Not a bad list, although I'm not sure why you're reading a Hartnell Target when all the others are original novels. Let me qualify that statement: it's a great book, in fact one of my all-time favorites, but of all the Doctors, the original Hartnell novels are of a very high standard indeed. Troughton, on the other hand...
ReplyDeleteI'd also recommend a different, Hinchcliffe-era Tom book, but you like "funny" Doctor Who about 500x more than I do, so perhaps that's just my prejudice talking. If you're going to go for season 17, though, IMO Gareth Roberts captured it better.
And I've never read it - but why Banquo Legacy? I've just rarely heard anything about it, pro or con, so it's a little bit of a surprise to see it here.
It's mainly books that I own but haven't read. The Crusaders was a present last year, and also reprazents the Target books. Festival of Death is one of the few reputedly good 4th Doctor novels I haven't read - and I can buy the reissue in March. I've read all Gareth Roberts' novels before.
DeleteThe Banquo Legacy is a similar situation - an Eighth Doctor novel with a good reputation that I haven't read. (I don't own any unread EDA's.)
The only exception is Foreign Devils. I wanted to read a Telos novella, and though I have read that one, I don't mind returning to it after so long. I might end up re-reading The Roundheads, or just getting a copy of The Wheel of Ice instead.
Oh yes, I didn't just grab this list from thin air, y'know!
If I get to Wheel of Ice before you do, I'll let you know how it goes.
ReplyDeleteI haven't read any of the books on your list except CRYSTAL BUCEPHALUS and it wasn't any fun and a bit impenetrable sorry to say! Have you read GOTH OPERA ? I love that one!
ReplyDelete